Solbergs sammensurium

hdrpl
Klimafornektere og innvandringsmotstandere tar Solberg fullstendig avstand fra, når de ikke slumper til å være ministere i hennes egen sammensuriumsregjering. Illustrasjon: Christina Fjeldavli

https://www.tv2.no/a/11246756/

Et sammensurium er, ifølge Store Norske Leksikon, en rotete eller forvirret blanding. Ordet kommer fra nedertysk (sammelsuur) og betyr opprinnelig «en sur blandingsrett av matrester». Å ta vare på middagsrester må vel kunne sies å være en bærekraftig og klimavennlig handling. Sjefspådriver for FNs bærekraftsmål, den grønnkledde Erna Solberg, velger likevel å bruke dette ordet for å beskrive Folkeopprøret mot klimahysteriet. Statsministeren vil ha seg frabedt sure matrester i form av klimafornektere og innvandringsmotstandere. Disse tar hun nemlig fullstendig avstand fra, når de ikke slumper til å være ministere i hennes egen sammensuriumsregjering.

I Solbergs regjeringskjøleskap finner vi isbiter som sprekkeferdige av stolthet åpner helt nye oljeplattformer, og en oppdrettslaks som vil deponere gruveslam i fjorder, «for å lykkes med det grønne skiftet». I grønnsaksskuffen finner vi den kjerneløse løken fra Ibsens Peer Gynt, som, i samarbeid med Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat, vil sprenge i stykker intakte økosystemer, utrydde rødlistede fugler og drenere myrer. Grunnet plassmangel er reinkjøttet erstattet med en kjøleskapsmagnet med bilde av samegutten Ante, fra NRK-serien ved samme navn. Mer skal det ikke til for å ivareta urfolks rettigheter.

Som sjefspådriver for FNs bærekraftsmål, er den grønnkledde forførerinnen programforpliktet til å snakke høyt om klimaproblemer. Det underlige er at FN ikke stusser over sjefens klimasammensurium på hjemmebane. FNs klimapanel oppfordres herved til å ta en titt bak Solbergs kjøkkenpanel.

qrf
FNs klimapanel bør ta en titt bak Solbergs kjøkkenpanel. Illustrasjon: Christina Fjeldavli

(PS: Jeg har selv ikke signert oppropet Folkebevegelsen mot klimahysteriet, blant annet fordi jeg mener bruken av ordet “klimahysteri” er uheldig.)

 

2 thoughts on “Solbergs sammensurium

  1. Berit Kvåle February 28, 2020 / 11:25 pm

    155,000 people in Norway are in grest frustrasion against a a good deal of parliamentary / governmental political decisions and behavior. Does it scare our top government at the Storting, that the stunt from ourcStatsminister on the news is to scare off potential interested people away from this group?
    This group is spacious and captures many communities’ engaging issues and different opinions can be discussed here in joint forums. Thus, perhaps this group can be perceived as more dangerous than all the 1-case oriented groups. This group has debated the initiator, who stands out reasonably with his opinions. Oh well!
    Some opinions are different from mine.
    And what then?
    Aren’t these differences of opinion the basis of democracy?
    I am a member of this group Because of the diversity of the member’s opinions and political views

    Never thought I in Norway should question whether we have democracy?

    I am not a racist, I know, am a neighbor with and deal with immigrants in the same way I do with ethnic Norwegians.
    I am for 2-sided more fair and good inclusive immigration policy, which demands. As of today, we are cutting and coating.
    Is it wrong to think so?

    I’m against Eu
    and against the ravages of agriculture and nature in the ruthless cynical way I now witness overshadowed in Norway -political willed green politics.
    Communication – roads, ferries, trains, aircrafts in the periphery of Norway are about to be razed, people are struggling and the ghost of centralization is threatening. Do I like it?

    Welfare is curtailed, built down, relocated and restructured, I think welfare and health have been unsafe.

    All this we strive for ordinary people in Norway because our financial resources are to be distributed in hut and torment to pay for recognition, bring up wind power founders, stuff the pockets of those who live in abundance even more …
    It is so unfair, wrong priority!

    I don’t like Eu!

    No politician can decide that I think everything about the green shift is good, I disagree with a good part of that policy.

    Wind power I think is a failed policy.

    I began to doubt the UN system years ago.
    I am for and against other issues as well.

    I thought it was democratic right to have my own opinions.
    Has it become politically incorrect for the government party to have functioning democracy in Norway, and different views?

    What systems are we going to be in, and are we into, which is not disclosed much?
    Is there anything more the governing powers have on the agenda that I have not brought with me?

    Like

    • christinafjeldavli February 29, 2020 / 7:03 pm

      Thank you for sharing your thoughts here. Wise words. I hope Solberg will read it🦉🌼🐞Christina

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.